The Wealth
Experiment
Start an experiment

Site Flipping · Case study 01

Automately:
the decision comes first.

A public record of a possible sale, starting with the questions we need to answer.

Considering a sale · Updated 2026-10-14

Visit Automately → · Read why letting go is difficult →

Current decision
Evaluate before committing
Marketplace listing
Not documented yet
Asking / sold price
Not set / no sale reported
Revenue & profit
Not verified in this review
Project costs & hours
Not yet reconciled
Buyer demand
Not yet measured here

Missing evidence means unknown, not zero. Listing price, buyer offers and the final amount received will be recorded separately.

Why Automately is the first candidate.

Its automation focus is clear, its name can stand apart from Ashley, and its existing resources offer a starting point for an automation agency or educator. A directory with paid listings and featured placements could give the brand a more specific commercial offer. That is a proposed model to test—not proof of paying customers or recurring income.

Scope of this review · October 14, 2026
AreaCurrent evidenceWhat still needs checking
Public experienceHomepage and Lead Journey Monitor route returned HTTP 200 during review.Mobile usability, complete task flows, broken links and error handling. A successful page load is a limited check.
Resources and toolsSource documents workflow guides, opportunity and mapping tools, SOP analysis and browser-local journey review.Demo each included tool. Explain which functions are local, rules-based, manual or connected to a real backend.
Lead operationsSource documents Postgres lead capture, optional MailerLite handoff and a protected operator monitor.Test with consented sample data. Provider acceptance does not establish inbox delivery. Do not expose real lead records in a demo.
Monitoring productDocumentation explicitly limits the monitor to this installation and browser-local review workspaces.Do not describe it as a finished multi-tenant subscription service or continuous external monitoring.
Paid directoryListings, submissions and featured placements are a requested direction; delivery is not verified by this audit.Verify submission → moderation → payment → publication, placement duration, expiry, cancellation/refund handling and admin controls before selling that capability.
Revenue and transferNo reconciled revenue, traffic valuation or completed transfer was supplied for this review.Gather dated records; define included assets and exclusions; document recurring costs and buyer-owned accounts.

The improvements worth doing before listing.

  1. Choose one clear offer. Decide whether the asset is an automation resource site, a working paid directory, or a specific monitoring product. Explain the other features without combining them into an inflated SaaS claim.
  2. Prove the core journey. If the directory is included, demonstrate one test submission, moderation decision, payment outcome and published placement; make test transactions distinguishable from real revenue.
  3. Collect customer evidence. Try to secure a small number of real paid listings or pilot customers. Record the price, refund terms, delivery work and repeat interest. This is a proposed test, not an achieved milestone.
  4. Make the handoff independent. Replace or explicitly exclude Ashley’s personal booking, coaching and shared account dependencies. Prepare a fresh deployment and account setup runbook.
  5. Package the evidence. Record analytics date ranges, content inventory, rights, costs, maintenance hours, known issues, backup/restore instructions and an accurate walkthrough.

Adding more features only helps if it resolves a buyer’s specific uncertainty. Finish the core experience and evidence before expanding the scope again.

What would a buyer receive?

This is a proposed asset inventory, subject to ownership and transfer checks and an eventual written agreement. Nothing has been transferred.

Not automatically included: Waymaker, other portfolio sites, Ashley’s ongoing consulting, personal payment accounts, shared provider credentials or third-party licenses that cannot transfer.

Download the buyer-pack checklist →

The dated record.

  1. Start with the decision, including the difficult part

    Ashley is considering Automately as a first sale candidate and finding it difficult to choose because she has put love and care into all of the sites. This entry opens the Site Flipping experiment. No asking price, buyer offer, transaction or financial result has been reported.

  2. Separate the current product from the next idea

    The public homepage and Lead Journey Monitor route responded successfully in this review. Repository documentation describes workflow resources, lead capture, browser-local review tools and an operator monitor for this installation. Paid directory listings and featured placements are a proposed direction; their release and paid transactions have not been verified by this review.

Next decision: complete the readiness and owner-fit review. Then decide whether to prepare a listing, improve a specific gap, or keep the site.

Free download · The Experiment Scorecard

Know if your side idea is actually working.

A 6-page scorecard for testing one income idea: the signal ladder, a four-week evidence log, the true-cost check, and a clear continue / change / pause decision. Download it now, with no signup required. You can also request occasional notes from Ashley’s experiments.

Download the free scorecard

Follow at your own pace

Keep a place
in the experiment.

Read the latest field note, or add the free feed to your RSS reader for new articles and build walkthroughs.

Email signup is not available yet. The journal, feed, and downloads are ready to use.