My strongest ideas
have been here for years.

The review covered 85 tabs across my SearchMedia and Wealth Experiment workbooks. Much of the planning comes from 2020–2023. Some tabs repeat earlier lists, and some contain research or references. This is a record of recurring interests and plans, not 85 separate businesses or proof of sales.

What stands out is the consistency. The names and tools have changed, but the direction is familiar: help people make something of the skills and experience they already have. Wealth Experiment gives those ideas a place to become small, visible tests.

The ideas I kept returning to

• Creators who aren’t 20. That phrase appears in the SearchMedia “Generate Income!” tab. It gives a name to an audience I still want to serve: people with experience, responsibilities, and something useful to share.
• Teach you, coach you, or build with you. The “Waymakers” tab outlines teaching, coaching, and done-for-you help alongside marketing, design, and development. Those choices now have a home in my private support packages.
• Turn expertise into a course or workshop. Instructional design and course creation appear in “OLD In Flight” and other plans. The first useful version can be one workshop, one learner outcome, and one practical exercise.
• Build useful websites and consider selling them. SearchMedia’s “Projects” tab and the Wealth Experiment November 2023 planning tabs both include site building and flipping. Automately is a current candidate to evaluate; no sale result is claimed.
• Make learning practical and creative. CodeTeachers, family workshops, printables, and useful templates recur too. They remain options, with a smaller first test than a whole new platform.

What consistency tells me—and what buyers still need to tell me

Years of returning to an idea suggest sustained interest and a body of relevant work to draw on. They do not establish current demand, profitability, or the best price. The useful next step is to choose a specific buyer and see whether that person wants the result enough to make a commitment.

My working priority is one main commercial test at a time. Teaching, practical AI, and launch support can share an audience and delivery process. Each new domain adds maintenance and a new place to find customers, so a name alone is not a reason to start another business.

The decisions from this review

1. Focus now: practical services and teaching. Use AI working sessions and existing launch support to help with one real task. Record inquiries, paid work when it occurs, delivery time, and whether clients reuse what they learned.
2. Reactivate the audience idea. Creators who aren’t 20 now has a starting page within Wealth Experiment, connected to the existing workshop and offer-building tools.
3. Test a workshop-creation service next. The new workshop creation brief scopes one outcome, outline, exercise, and invitation. A paid pilot would be evidence to expand; publishing a page is only the beginning.
4. Continue the Automately readiness review. Verify the asset, costs, ownership, transfer steps, and any commercial records before deciding to list. A starter site should be described by what exists; a proven business needs verified results.
5. Keep a creative-product test small. Choose one existing brand and one downloadable product. Set a time and spending limit; measure purchases, support, and margin before adding a catalog.
6. Keep family workshops for a later test. Try one CodeTeachers session with parent feedback before building a membership or app. Put accountability features into the existing Waymaker work before considering a separate product.

Which old domains deserve another look?

These are historical names from the workbooks. Current ownership, availability, renewal cost, reputation, and trademark fit have not been verified. They are a shortlist to review after demand appears, not active offers or instructions to buy.

• createacourse.live: the clearest fit for the workshop-creation offer. Test the offer here first; consider the name only if a separate brand becomes useful.
• uxteachers.com and productdesign.careers: plausible specialist teaching directions. Choose one audience and one paid-session test before activating either.
• techiecrafter.com and designresources.store: possible homes for a bounded creative-product test. Use an existing brand first to avoid splitting attention.
• goalautomation.com and brainygiggles.com: keep in reserve. They introduce another product or audience before the current priorities have produced enough evidence.

Seasonal shops, broad affiliate portfolios, and new standalone apps are lower priorities. Existing projects can host a gift guide or a useful feature without restarting a whole portfolio. Older bulk-link and mass-content ideas need a fresh approach; the SEO review explains that change.

The next evidence to collect

Check which idea to revive Use five questions to choose a next step, then download a conversation guide and pilot brief.

A proposed first test: have five relevant customer conversations about one offer, then invite a suitable person to a clearly scoped paid pilot. These are decision rules for the next test, not completed activity. Log objections and delivery effort as carefully as interest.

Review after four weeks: continue if there is a meaningful commitment and feasible delivery; revise if the problem is real but the offer misses; pause if the same outreach produces little interest and no clear problem worth solving. A small sample is directional, not a market-size estimate.

Download the test-plan worksheet

About this review

Sources: 44 tabs in SearchMedia.xlsx and 41 in Wealth Experiment.xlsx, including Generate Income!, Waymakers, OLD In Flight, Projects, and the November 2023 planning tabs. Findings distinguish original plans, repeated entries, and reference material. The workbook counts describe the review scope; repetition is not counted as independent customer evidence.

This page publishes selected business conclusions. Account information, credentials, and private operational records are excluded. The review was prepared with AI assistance and edited into this public decision record. Customer outcomes and search results will be added only when there is evidence to report.